I've said it before, and I'll say it again...

It just *kills* 'em that what Bobert was saying back in 2002/2003 has actually come to pass, and what they were saying in the same period has been shown to be utter horsecrap.

A *lot* of people here were saying the same stuff back then, but for some reason, it really pisses them off that Bobert in particular was right.

Now they have to spin and parse and narrowly define and backpedal and flail wildy to try to prove that they have not been thoroughly out-thunk by the lowly WGSR.

The closest they can come to a "win" now, is a 5000 word essay with eleventeen bullet points, and a few red herring questions, that don't get answered in exactly the way they demand, so they can shout "gotcha!"