So Don, "The evidence is there,". Is it Don? That's odd because you seem to be very reticent about bringing any of it forward.

According to you Don, "There has been considerable testimony from his flying mates in the Texas Air National Guard about his attendance and behavior, and also from officers he served under. And there is a considerable amount of documentation."

Indeed there is Don, amongst that pile of documentation, the following evaluations:

The 1969 - 1970 evaluation said Bush "clearly stands out as a top notch fighter interceptor pilot" and was "a natural leader whom his contemporaries look to for leadership."

The 1970 - 1971 evaluation called Bush "an exceptionally fine young officer and pilot" who "continually flies intercept missions with the unit to increase his proficiency even further."

The 1971 - 1972 evaluation called Bush "an exceptional fighter interceptor pilot and officer."

Lt.G.W.Bush was considered to be in the top 5% passing out of OTU, some achievement flying an aircraft as difficult to pilot as the F-102A.

Another thing you will find in that pile of paperwork is the fact that in terms of qualifying points he accrued three times the minimum number required for six years of service.

Now Michael Moore wouldn't mention any of that would he Don? Can't understand why, he does investigate things and write and produce his docufictionaries from a purely objective point of view doesn't he? Hell as like and you all know it. Michael Moore writes and produces what Michael Moore does for one reason and one reason only - To make money for Michael Moore. He knows that he is shooting fish in a barrel because clowns like you and Bobert will slaver over every morsel gulping down every tidbit, purely because it is what you want to believe - only thing is Don none of it stands up to any sort of examination.