Thanks for the regurgitation of the SOS Don.

Anyone reading it can go through the this simple exercise - count how many times "should of" is used, count how many times "supposed" is used. I did accuse you Don of introducing supposition instead of evidence.

How do you, or any of the sources you have produced know with any degree of certainty what gaps exist? Fact is that you do not know.

You, and the sources you are so eager to push forward, may venture an opinion on what should exist and compare that to what exists in the public domain, but that Don is supposition it is not fact.

Just because you think that a document should exist does not necessarily mean that in reality it does exist, and the fact that it cannot be found does not mean that this supposed document is missing or has been destroyed in some nefarious cover up operation.

The people who had all the records checked them and gave GWB a clean bill of health plus an honourable discharge - you and those like you might not like that - tough - but them's the breaks - learn to live with it.

But please, stop trying to present supposition as fact.