The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #108213   Message #2249481
Posted By: Jeri
31-Jan-08 - 08:47 AM
Thread Name: BS: Arlo endorses Paul?
Subject: RE: BS: Arlo endorses Paul?
Little Hawk and Richard Bridge, you guys appear to know quite a bit about the US Constitution. Could you possibly quote the parts of it relevant to your statements?

Little Hawk: "It's not really fair, Mike, to expect the 1787 version of the Constitution to match today's rights for women, Blacks, or Native Americans (Amerindians)...because it simply reflected the prevailing social ideas of its own time."

Richard Bridge: "But since the 1787 constitution does not match modern standards of equality,... "

From what I can see, the Constitution didn't give any group of people more rights than another. The disparities were caused by the way people interpreted it, and the amendments were added to protect rights that were interpreted away. (15th: Race [1870]; 19th: Women's Suffrage [1920])