BillD stated that the founding fathers did not know what would be developed in terms of arms, and thus the 2nd amendment needed to be modified.

I merely pointed out that they did not know what would be devloped in terms of speech, etc, either: It seems that they night well have distinguished between a person standing up and making a speech ( and being subjected to disagreements, corrections et al that all listening would hear) and the posting of a blog on the internet, with it's instannt world-wide distribution.

But Bill says that is different, from what I read in his comment.