A couple of points raised by Dave Polshaw:

"Nothing wrong with the BBCs documentary, Al. It was a damning report on anyone who traffics in human misery. Nothing wrong with you pointing out that it was on. Provided of course that you did not do so just to gloat in the fact that these criminals happened to be Indian."

And

"Where do you stand, for instance, on bubblyrats contention that 'they' should all be sent back to where they came from? What would you do with people trafficers? Would you treat them all equaly or would you send the Indian ones 'back home' and give the English ones a jail sentence? What would you do with Indians who are here legaly if the commited crimes? What would you do with the crowd of second and third generation Bangladeshi kids who beat up white lad? What would you do with a crowd of Englsih lads that knifed a Bosnian immigrant?"

But Dave the BBC item makes it clear doesn't it? The trafficers were not only Indian were they? They themselves were in the UK illegally, they had no "right" to be here, they certainly did not have any "right" to be here engaged in human trafficking, so in my book "bubblyrat" is perfectly correct, having been apprehended, they should by tried in accordance with English Law. If found guilty they should be sentenced to the appropriate term in prison and upon release immediately deported and barred from ever entering the country again as "undesirable aliens - persona non grata". In addition I personally would confiscate all assets and keep them in jail until compensation had been paid to those they preyed upon from any assets abroad.

Your other questions you answer yourself:

"What would you do with people trafficers? Would you treat them all equaly or would you send the Indian ones 'back home' and give the English ones a jail sentence? What would you do with Indians who are here legaly if the commited crimes?" - As stated above if the trafficers are here illegally they get shipped back on completion of sentence, in all cases I would confiscate all assets as compensation to those they preyed upon.

"What would you do with the crowd of second and third generation Bangladeshi kids who beat up white lad?" - They should be subject to English Law if the offence happened in England. Strange way you describe the assailants, which demonstrates the flaws of ZA-NU Labours "multiculturalism", their thinking sets up the differences that cause division in society ("Socialism" must always fight some form of class war, even if they have to invent the classes). By the second or third generation these kids should be thinking of themselves as "British kids" not "Bangladeshi kids". If people from anywhere in the world seek asylum and permanent resident in any country then it is their duty to assimilate with the local customs, culture and way of life, they have no right whatsoever to enter a foreign country as a guest and then demand that their hosts alter their way of life, or make exceptions for them.

"What would you do with a crowd of Englsih lads that knifed a Bosnian immigrant?" - Subject to English Law, under the current proposals the UK tax payer would of course have to provide return taxi fares and "per diem" living expenses for the hospital visit to the Bosnian immigrant that they attacked - Personally? I'd birch them publicly and lock them up for eight years with no remission.