"Amos and Little Hawk are ridiculing Krauthammer's arguments. I think that is fair game"

IF they were ridiculing the arguments, I would agree with you- but I see them attacking the author, and leaving the arguements untouched- hence still valid.


If I were to do the same with the NYTimes editorials, do you think Amos would let me get away with it? I doubt it, and am just looking for a "level playing field"- If Amos considers it OK when applied to Bush, it should be OK when applied to Obama.