Don't worry about the glasses Amos. If I believed in right of something as obsessively as you, and obviously Kucinich do, then I would have some sort of answers worked out for the rather elementary questions that I have asked you.

But you have no answers have you?

1) Neither Bush, nor anyone in his administration ever said that Iraq, or Saddam Hussein had anything to do with 9/11 - Recorded Fact - So how could Bush be accused of taking US troops to war on the false assumption that Iraq did have something to with 9/11 - Kucinich's accusation on this point is ridiculous and untenable

2) How could Kucinich know what Iraq's intentions were throughout this period? Answer: He couldn't that would have been impossible.

3) How could GWB know Iraq's intentions throughout this period? Answer: He couldn't that would have been impossible.

4) How could Kucinich know that GWB knew what Iraq's intentions were throughout the period in question? Answer: He couldn't that would have been impossible.

Now then Amos combine 2, 3 & 4 above and the premise put forward by Dennis Kucinich is demonstrably idiotic.

The other points raised by Dennis Kucinich are equally ridiculous and represent his opinion, he can produce no evidence because there is no evidence. What he is mounting is a rather fanciful campaign of "chinese whispers", which makes him out to be rather pathetic and lacking in integrity.