1. The so-called "lies" are not proven, but assumed by those who have already decided that Bush is guilty. There has been extensive discussion, and the only ones convinced by the "proof" had decided that before any evidence was even presented.

2. The actions that Bush is accused of were reasonable and correct BASED on the information available at the time that the decisions were made. International sources and UN documents were in agreement that Saddam had unaccounted for material and WMD Programs, and was in violation of the UNR that established the post-Kuwait truce.

3. There are specific counts that may well be brought against members of the Bush administration, that they exceeded their lawful authority. In those cases, the individuals should be tried and it determined IF they are guilty.

I have seen no charges that are specific to Bush, and all others could be pardoned by him, making this whole discussion moote.