I presented in quotes with no comments with a link to the full transcript. I cannot post the whole thing as it would be too big.

No matter what, you invent an anal retentive reason to disqualify anything presented while you concoct your own rules on the fly to justify what you post. One set of variable rules for Amos and another for those that disagree with him.

Amos's smug I'm always right, you are always wrong policy.

Then when you point out something he said that is blatantly wrong like his advocating "Summary Justice" for terrorists, he gets all hostile and resorts to personal attacks.