Well, here's another question. We ha dlaong upthread dispensed with the fictitious booklist. According to Emmons' testimony the question was raised not one one occasion, but on three separate ones.
But let's ignore the book-banning issue. What is a "loyalty test"? What kind of a criteria is that to impose on a librarian, for goodness' sake? What measure of results in a library system would such a test ensure? And what is the mindset of an executive who considers that proactively testing others for their loyalty is a priority executive action?
Was she acting as a town mayor or a fuerher? What the hell kind of question is that to impose on a library manager?