I would suggest that the cor einteraction of attention between "units" of ;ife gets complexified by the plasticity and the tendency to drum up pictures in response to the stimulation, rather than simply see what is there. All of Bill's highly favored pychological tests demonstrate the endless human capacity to dub in more than is actually seen.

What is of interest to me is not that "X occurred and J saw an angel..." (or an alien or a goddess or a demon or a mercurial messenger in a hardhat). The interesting thing is what X really consisted of and how to learn more about such events.


A