OK then Amos let's give Charles Bellizzi of Streamwood, Illinois his lead shall we and see how far he gets with his, "one bit of proof: How about when asked if he was still in the hunt for Bin Ladin? His response was and "I don't give it much thought anymore." That, my friend, is reason enough for me."

Does Mr. Bellizzi of Streamwood honestly believe, or expect that, the President of the United States of America should be "in the hunt for Bin Laden"?? From this, I take it that Mr. Bellizzi, like yourself Amos, when it comes to matters relating to George W. Bush as President of the United States just cannot put aside absolutley damn silly questions. As far as I am aware there have been thousands of US troops actively engaged in hunting down Osama Bin Laden and the rest of the leadership of Al-Qaeda and the Taleban in Afghanistan and along the Afghan-Pakistan Border for seven years now, they have never stopped, or tired in their efforts to capture or kill those men, in fact they've come damn close on occasion. Now can Chuck, detail the many and varied successful Al-Qaeda attacks that have resulted from lack of concentration on the part of the Chief Executive - I somehow think that he'd be pushed to do that don't you? So I think Chuck of Streamwood wouldn't get very far in the prosecution of his case.

Now the second part where Mr Bellizzi plaintively remarks:

"One of the things he is sworn to do is protect America from its enemies and he doesn't think about it much anymore. Are you kidding me?"

Oh no Mr. Bellizzi, I am not kidding you, the current holder of the Office of President of the United States of America has a far better track record with regard to protecting America than his predecessor - Now that could be easily demonstrated in any court Mr. Bellizzi wants to prosecute his case.

Once again Amos present evidence, not opinion that you think is evidence.