WAV; unlike you, I'll answer the question; my stance on 'Engrish Frute' is that I have no 'stance' as such; I recognise it for what it is, a humorous remark, not meant to harm or disadvantage others. Now, having had a direct reply to your question, perhaps you would do me the courtesy of responding in full to my earlier post? So far, I note that you have not been able to muster any sort of counter argument to the logical sequence posited, merely reverting to questions with little or no relevance to the central point. Once again, this seems to be a common tactic amongst racists; when challenged effectively about their central belief system, they always talk about something else. It's usually economics, or law, or religion; anything to avoid making the key admission that they simply don't like or understand foreigners, and don't want them polluting their country/street/culture. I still think you are the worst kind of racist, and until you make a reasoned argument to the contrary, without using your utterly discredited websites as evidence I shall continue to think so. I'm not alone here; there are many better minds than mine engaged in discussion with you, and almost all have reached the same conclusion. Come on WAV; convince me you aren't a racist. I for one would be glad to hear a sound argument that you aren't; but I repeat, nothing on your websites, or posted by you on the Mudcat so far even comes close to being that argument. On the contrary; almost every utterance has the opposite effect, reinforcing the impression that you are irredeemably racist.
I look forward to a considered and comprehensive reply, not another inane and irrelevant question.
Tim