Do you need help understanding the question?

You seem to be trying to say that Mac gave money to Khalidi and that is more wrong than Obama's association with Khalidi and also giving him money because of the amount of money involved.

I am trying to understand the logic in your scoring system for your assesment of guilt.

So far it eludes me.

Seems you mostly base it on the amount of money that came from Mac's outfit when Mac Didn't know Khalidi or meet him or associate with him.

The Obamas are personal friends of the Khalidis, dine with them regularly have political discussions but that is not wrong because he gave less money to him than Mac did.

So a series of simple yes or no questions should reveal the logic here, if there is any logic and not just ideological biases. In that case there is no logic to be revealed, just emotional knee jerk reactions.