Ah, but Amos, for the alleged crimes to be brought to trial there has to be evidence, and that evidence has to stand up to fairly well defined "Rules of Evidence".

Now you and others on this forum, on this and on many other threads have been repeatedly asked to provide the evidence which you yourself have said is abundant. Only thing that puzzles me is that to date you, and those others, have singularly failed to do so.

All you have ever offered is "opinion", sometimes even your own, but not one shred of evidence.

Find anything "weaselly" in that summation Amos??