Nice, Pip; logical strings are always good to see.
WAV; Pip's post above is what academics refer to as 'reason'. He has concluded, using an authoritative source definition (the OED) and impeccable inductive logic that your expressed view of 'the act of immigration itself' is racist. You refuse to retract this view, indeed you promote it as part of your 'life's work' and 'a better way for humanity'. This recidivism therefore leads us to conclude that you are in fact an unapologetic racist. Using the same inductive logic, without resorting to unsubstantiated sources and unsupported opinion, can you argue otherwise? (Without referring to your utterly discredited websites). Take that as a challenge, WAV. I don't think you're up to it, myself.
I'd love to be able to make the logical connection that all racists are scum, but sadly that's just a personal opinion.