The thing is though John, a lot of what the Daily Mail has forecast, has actually come true. I recall reading a very good article of theirs about The Human Rights Act, and how, in bringing it in, every Tom, Dick and Whatsisname would be jumping on the bandwagon, claiming this and that, taking everyone to court for the merest whiff of "It's against my Human Rights, mate!

And....er....hasn't that come to pass?

They stand up for morals, true...but what's wrong with that? I think it's a great shame that MORE papers don't. I think it's all part of the reason why 13 years old are taking the Morning After Pill and why UNICEF have declared the children of the United Kingdon the unhappiest in the WORLD. Yeesh! Something to be proud of, huh?

The Daily Mail Reader. I have had it flung at me many a time, but I've never understood why, other than, for some, it seems to be the biggest insult they can ladle out.

Someone would think there was a personal vendetta going on somewhere...or something?

Can't wait to hear what a Middle Englander is. I think I may have been called that as well.

So, if The Guardian had been the one to blow the whistle on Ross and Brand, to stand up and say "Enough!", would that have been considered OK?