the reviewer[slagger]also creates confusion,by not just reveiwing the cd,but reveiwing the television programme.
I assume he is supposed to be reviewing the cd.
this reviewer tell us quite a lot about himself,he must be late fifties[upwards]he must be English[or spent the 1960s in England]
He must have spent some time in Ireland.,to be watching Geantrai regularly.
perhaps he hasnt watched it at all,but wishes to make waves,to create publicity for Froots.
he contradicts himself in the review,firstly there is something rotten,then he says all the above are far from being rotten.
what is rotten,is the low standard of review allowed in froots.
so the reviewer tells us he doesnt like the guitar accompanists,he mentions nineteen tracks,but only gives details of five perfomances.
I understood the purpose of a review,was to give information[what happened to the other 14 tracks]who did they feature.
why mention his opinion of the tv programme,when he is supposed to be reviewing the cd.
froots need to pull their socks up and get someone who understands the essence of reviewing.