Genie -

Apologies if I misread your intent. The slight ambiguity is one reason I didn't cite by post date/time back to your post. I intended to make my comment sufficiently vague to not point specifically to your post, but apparently I was insufficiently vague if it seemed that I did.

Of course we should all have lots of faith in orders from a court that meets in secret, whose members identities are secret, whose orders and deliberations/conclusions are secret, etc.

But we KNOW that someone's taking care of us.

(Court member IDs have been "leaked" a couple of times, but members are rotated frequently, and are often gone from the court before it's known who they might have been. Even when leaked, one is never sure if the info is, or was, credible. Members are picked/assigned by ... guess who(?))

John