Regards name calling and hypocricy.

Harry doesn't enter my thoughts much at all I must confess. And to be honest, though I have very strong misgivings about the Royal Family, I think Charlie isn't a bad man. And I think he takes his duties seriously. But if the Royals are to function usefully in any way, and as far as I can see, their sole 'legitimate' function (if any) is as *figureheads*, then their behaviours *must* be exceptional.

I have no feelings about Harry, other than his behaviours indicate to me that he is at best a weak, foolish, ignorant, and evidently over priviliged young man. Whose behaviours on more than one occassion *that we actually know of* again, strongly suggest to me, that he is a chip off the old (with his "slitty-eyes" and "fuzzy-wuzzies") Philip block.

And indeed, I've never called him *any* name in my life, apart from *on this thread*. And that, PURELY to demonstrate what I'd hope might be a pretty self-evident point. Which has obviously not been made... Or has it?

I for one remain distinctly unimpressed, and think that the Royals need to begin seriously cleaning up their act. We are now in a multi-cultural UK. The Wogs, Paki's, and Towelheads as well as the Slitty Eyes, Fuzzie-Wuzzies and Kykes ain't going back 'home', this is their home. With it's Tikka Masalas, Reggae, Irish pubs, Donner Kebabs and now the all new Eastern European Folk Music on our streets.

These people need to recognise that they now must represent *all* citizens of these Isles in order to maintain whatever legitimacy as figureheads for the UK, they may be capable of continuing to make any convincing claim for.

Evidently Eton is utterly worthless as an education for teaching the young Royals how to perform their duties correctly in this modern UK - where they are no-longer rulers of a 'great' Empire, but (exceedingly well paid) public servants of this multi-cultural little island. Well, well. I guess that's not exactly a surprise...