Further, Spirituality is a human scheme, flawed from the outset as people ponder the nature of an all too elusive truth - and whilst they can't all be right they can all be wrong. It's this latter proposition I tend to go by...

And I go by the former. I think that kind of counterbalancing is part of what keeps conversations "alive." Two views can differ without there being a need to use the difference as argument. Or conflict. "I" see "this," "you" see "that." They are probably both there. Both incomplete. Both inviting a closer look to see what else is also there.

~S~