"I wouldn't be upset to have a nice guy rethink his position...."

Neither would I. Perhaps that is why I keep pointing out when someone makes false statements regarding guns or gun laws.


I do not see why it is OK to remove rights to "save lives" ( debateable point: already stated that the gun laws proposed do not reduce gun deaths) from gun violence, but wrong to remove rights to "save lives" from terrorist attacks.

Can someone explain why a terrorist has a greater set of rights than a law-abiding citizen?