The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #121085   Message #2642248
Posted By: Phil Edwards
27-May-09 - 06:00 PM
Thread Name: Are 'Folk Arts' Elitist?
Subject: RE: Are 'Folk Arts' Elitist?
Folk is the simple fact that people do such things, seasonally, ceremonially, festively, ritually, by way of observance, remembrance, celebration, recreation, entertainment and devotion.

Folk as folk performance - that might work. But it would mean that lots of things that most people call folk aren't, and lots of things are folk that most people - including the people involved - don't call folk. (The Dylan night I went to last week was almost entirely folk by this definition.)

I think something definitive of 'folk' gets lost if the folk artform itself isn't continually evolving and changing - which is almost bound to be the case if you're using traditional material, but not if you're trying to sing the words Dylan wrote the way Dylan sang them.