Amos:

"The oppression I am objecting to is legally denying certain aspects of citizenhood to a subset of adult citizen because of their sexual orientation."

Exactly. Me too.

My last posts were:

1) at 11:06 AM, a swipe at our resident gloaty goat who seems to think we are opposing such oppression only from an egotistical need to win or have the last word, and

2) at 5:31 PM a response to Akenaton who seemed to claim that simply questioning his (IMHO) dubious opinions is a form of oppression. That is, we are intolerant because we stand up to his intolerance.

Which of these two put shite in your oatmeal my friend? Or was it an earlier one?

I am certainly oft confused, but I think you may have outdid me in confuzzlement on this one.

TIA