Well done Keith, you may have found one part of an argument nothing to do with the topic at hand, that was incorrect. I was wrong to say the EHRC compiled the data, they had the IPPR compile the data. If you spent half as much time on your own posts and thoughts and stayed on topic then we might be more productive.

Now what is your point?

I think you are still trying to imply that because the Civitas rubbish is nonsensed because THE AUTHOR says he has no data and no supporting information, that the EHRC report should be rubbished because a lot of referenced and independent external data used in the report was compiled by a think tank?

If that is what you are imlying or thinking then you are still wrong.

Do you actually have anything to say about your earlier substantiive points and the evidence against them? Or anything new that is actually related to the topic?