"We need to get it right as best we can. "

I agree with this- so why do you keep advocating action without getting it right?


If you are right, having "preparations to adapt to global cooling and global warming, and the inevitable consequences of fluctuating ocean levels, temperatures, and precipitation that accompany climatic change" will be usefull, and attempting to stop it will be usefull.

If I am right ( and global warming occurs regardless) it is essential that we "prepare to adapt to global cooling and global warming, and the inevitable consequences of fluctuating ocean levels, temperatures, and precipitation that accompany climatic change", and all attempts to stop it are wasted effort.




So, which one is the side of caustion? If I am wrong, we have prepared for something that is not (immediately) occurring, and we live.

If King Al is wrong ( and we cannot stop Global warming) we have wasted the resources we need to survive.- And we die.


I think I know which one I will pick.