Ach, LH, you love taking up arms against ay agreement, in the certainty it must be unreasoning, because there is agreement. But what agreement there is on the carbon emissions problem is hard one, one voice at a time, and supported by a lot of hard numbers, all of which you cheerfully ignore in your free-wheeling meta-process. I would add you did much the same thing in another contest on the subject of gay rights--roundly condemning those who had a consensus merely because ti was a consensus while voicing no position on the facts or the issues or the positions based thereon.

Good luck with a' that, mon.


A