The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #103749 Message #2692471
Posted By: Stilly River Sage
02-Aug-09 - 07:06 PM
Thread Name: BS: News of Note (was 'I Read it . . .')
Subject: RE: BS: News of Note (was 'I Read it . . .')
I started this thread so I could put interesting articles in one place, but I also started it with an eye to the attitudes of news content providers toward cut and paste or referrals.
Looks like the Associated Press is going to try to crack down on Facebook posting of their stories--not sure how they'll do that, but here is the gist at Mashable.com.
We've known that the Associated Press has some odd policies in regards to social media and the web for a while. The AP social media policy says that employees need to control not only what they said on Facebook (Facebook), but what their friends said as well. We also got wind last week of the AP's plan to find where anyone uses AP material online in an attempt to stop what it considers unauthorized use of its content. To say it's causing controversy would be an understatement.
Part of the AP's plan is to charge for use of its articles if you quote 5 words or more. They signed a deal with iCopyright in April to accomplish this goal. iCopyright is a widget that handles not only print and email, but republishing as well. Well the widget's starting to get some attention, if only for the jaw-dropping starting price the AP is charging for quoting its stories: $2.50 per word.
If this is the case, then though I'll miss it, this, and the previous thread, are eligible to be deleted, of Mudcat is approached. And I'll make a point of linking and paraphrasing more, especially if it is AP stuff.
I should say that for what it's worth, I think the fair use provision of the copyright law won't let AP get so exclusive about it's content.
SRS