ok, so the general majority agree,we do need music critics,so if musical criticism is to be taken seriously,the standard of criticism needs to be high.
so how do music critics improve their reviews,and is there any reason why reviewers should not have their reviews reviewed.
my other thread only has 32 posts,and yet it is a more positive thread,which is disa ppointing.
Mr Webb,if you dont understand the above post,I would suggest a visit to the opticians.