The argument becomes a tautology. If you can't prove that god doesn't exist, therefore
he might. Or she might. Or it might. Or Santa Claus or Dawkin's Flying Spaghetti Monster might. Ignorance is bliss.

There is plenty of scientific evidence that refutes the idea of a single monothesism.
Teleology, ontology and cosmological evidence for the existence of a supreme being
has been refuted by science.

There is the rationale that the earth might be flat because we don't have enough information yet.

In the meantime, we are asked to be tolerant of ignorant suppositions. No thanks.

Frank