It states that "if the science is not completely settled, it is better to act anyhow to prevent possible bad outcomes".


So where is all the attention to dealing with the CONSEQUENCES of Global Warming, in case they ARE natural and inevitable???

The present actions to reduce carbon emmissions DO NOT ADDRESS the problem of adjusting to a changing climate- the ASSUME that the efforts will STOP what may or may nott be a natural process. It is the present PC crowd that wants to reduce carbon emmissions, and NOT deal with ANY of the effects of Climate Change that are NOT following the Precautionary Principle.


The sun is known to be a slightly variable star: Output has changed in the past, and WILL change in the future. By ignoring this, warmists are sticking their heads in the sand, and insisting on expensive fixes that will not solve the problem, but reduce the resources need to deal with the real effects of climate change.