Wrong, Keith. Stop diggging.

In the context - whether HIV was a disease that affected only gay people - it is true to say that the vast majority of newly diagnosed people living and shagging here in this country, are heterosexual . My point was that it doesn't matter - in context - where they caught it. In the post that you clipped those words out of, I was discussing the horrendous African statistics as further evidence that HIV was not - as was being claimed - a "gay" disease. That was the point, that was the context.

I was freely referencing the African or foreign acquired straight diagnoses in this country well before you arrived.

So, again, what is/was your bloody point? How often does this question have to be asked and by how many people before we get an answer from you?