Amos said there was a collapse:

"Let's start with the collapse of the economy"

"remedying the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression"

"reversing the economic collapse handed to him"

But earlier he posted something that said there was no collapse.

"Begin with something that didn't happen: financial collapse and great depression."

Then when I point that out to him and ask if there was or was not a collapse, he goes ballistic starts ranting his standard ad hominem attacks, rhetoric and lack of facts to back up anything he says.

Maybe Bobert can say if there was or was not a collapse.