Here's a couple of observations for now. The guys who made that report don't claim to know what happened. They only sought to show what, in their opinion, was wrong with Dr. Jones' hypotheses. They acknowledge that they don't have enough evidence to disprove some of what Jones is asserting, and they say themselves that further study is needed. On some of the points, they say only that Jones has not adequately proven this points. So this paper acts as a peer review of Jones' papers, and some of it no doubt has some validity. It's clear that Jones has not proven anything as of this point in time. And as the authors of this paper themselves admit, we need more investigation before we can draw any conclusions about what did happen.