I have looked over the rebuttals from Hansen's "superior", who says he was not his actual reporting superior. Here's the important point. Yes, computerized models are flawed. The US ones are more flawed than the EU ones. Granularity is one of the issues, to be sure. ANother one is completely unknown phenomena such as the recently discovered Niiler striation circulation patterns that change our understanding of ocean carbon processes.

But that level of detail and modeling itself does not rebut the raw values of temperature and CO2 ramp up, which are pretty clearly correlated chronologically even if with a little lag.

And most important, they do not change the fact that those values are breaking out of a range they have held for thousands of years.

A