Above, Royston & I have been asked to 'prove' our silly 'faith-based' opinions, and I have declined to do this, and my explanation...that it is not my job or my expertise or my inclination to "show" how it all happened simply is ignored, or I am insulted for my refusal.

Bill, if you were capable of carrying on a discussion in which you didn't persistently insult people in the exact same manner as you are saying you're being insulted, you might have an easier time of it in discussions like this one. And one of the most ridiculous aspects of the way you do this is you tell other people they are not being rational because they are not working with the facts, and then you proceed to use only your own belief in your rightness as your evidence to back up your assertions. If you're going to expect us to accept anything you have to say, you really can't expect us to accept it just because you say so. You seem to think that you have an inherent rightness that doesn't require any evidence whatever, and all you have to do is say a thing and you expect everyone to just accept it because of your inherent rightness. Doesn't work that way, I'm afraid, and it makes me wonder what kind of ego is required to have such an attitude about oneself.