In the first place, the offense I mentioned--posting screeds of others' work to fill the tumbrils of Mom's march--was surely yours. It was SO offensive I took to doing it myself just to get even!!

Secondly, your silly remarks about anti-Canuckian sentiment constitute drivel in the clear sense of being senseless. I have always been a friend to beavers everywhere.

Thirdly you added said remarks constituting drivel to a post cited under the defined offense, and thus compounded with said drivel said offense.

Now, if you find any of these assertions of mine arguably untrue (as distinct from merely being irked thereby) pray tell me how and in what wise, and I shall consider retraction.


A