just read Eds Link, written by Dr Gregory Herek a homosexual rights activist.
His Bio does not mention his sexual orientation, but it might be interesting to find out.
His CV is a catalogue of high profile defences of Homosexual rights issues.
His article is hardly objective or accurate relying on studies by Kinsey, who could not even get the percentage of homosexuals in the community anywhere near correct.
The points discussed are mainly personal opinion without any objective backing.....he contends that there is no way of telling whether a man who molests boys is homosexual or not.He also maintains that there should be no such crime as homosexual assault or paedophilia, rather, it should be termed "male on male molestation".....all this purely personal opinion and speculation.

As I posted earlier, the big UK paedophile ring, which was led by one of the highest ranking Gay Activists in the country was exclusively homosexual and the victims exclusively male children.

The vast majority of the abuse by priests in Boston, according to the John Jay report was against teenage boys and youths.

When I was a child, a homosexual and a woman, in a "sham marriage" fostered twelve children.....ten boys and two girls.
All of the boys, and two of my friends were sexually assaulted by the man, but neither of the girls were abused.
When the man was caught, he admitted the abuse, his sexual status and the status of his "marriage".....He was not charged (because of the scandal), but allowed to leave the district and no doubt continued his abuse elsewhere.

Thank you Mary, I have never said all homosexuals were paedophiles...that would make me as stupid as those who make that charge.
As I have said already, in this instance we are not in the main dealing with real paedophilia, but simple homosexual assault.
The instances of paedophilia by clergy are quite rare.