Finally, though there seems to be a strong tendency among the mindless to denigrate Wiki, the non-lazy would discover that Wiki is not in fact made up of whole cloth:   it does have footnotes and sources.   Said diligent researchers could in fact judge the reliability of sources cited and look elsewhere to see if a given statement has support outside Wiki.

Unless of course the main point is to make perfectly unsupported ex cathedra statements (AKA innuendo).   Which indeed does seem to be a main goal of at least one poster.

And by the way, that last statement is not unsupported. I can easily cite chapter and verse.

Goodnight, all.