Amos,

Again, you attack the person rather than the points presented. This indicates that you agree with those points, or at the least cannot find fault with them.


LH,

"The possession of a few nuclear weapons and a means to effectively launch them is the only possible way they could prevent America... "

I disagree with this statement: The danger is increased, because they are seen as a threat ( by giving that weapon to unstable terrorists who have already attacked the US) and thus need to be neutralized BEFORE the weapon can be used. Unfortunately, by not taking effective steps toward stopping Iran, Obama has created a situation which leads directly towards another World War, with nuclear weapons being used on both sides.

But it WILL reduce oil production ( and oil usage, and human population): So I guess he succeeds in reducing anthropologic CO2.