Having now read the article too (as we were crossing posts) I can see some added problems over the serial attackers. There has to be some compromise somewhere whereby they firm up the victim's support but also protect an alleged attacker better than they presently do.

Personally I do not think it is right that anyone can be named on any charge before guilt has been established. Quite what the 'cure' is to capture the serial criminal though I have no idea.

It certainly warrants discussion and good decisions for all involved don't you think?

Thanks for the URL

mp