Lox... "Currently in British Law, previous accusations can be used as evidence to support a sexual assault or abuse charge."

Would that not lead to a mistrial? Surely uproven accusations put forth by the plaintiff would be used by the defendant at least to discredit the credibility of the plaintiff??? How could such even remotely be admissible in a court of law???

Oops... I posted again on this thread which exonerates "victims" carte blanche. No trial, no jury, guilty no matter what.

But, I had to as I just can't believe your statement, Lox.

I shall try to refrain, once again, from even clicking on this thread.