Don,

The DOJ had won the CIVIL CASE against the three defendents- THEN the OBAMA appointees determined that the ALREADY WON judgement should not be pursued in two cases, and reduced in the last.


What part of this do you have a problem understanding? I understand the difference between civil and crimiinal- do you?

The civil case is what was dropped by the Obama DOJ- any talk about the criminal case ( which was not brought ) is a RED HERRING and ATTEMPTS to ignore the facts of the case.

I can't expect you to respect the facts, but at least stop saying that "if x then wigits" makes sense.