"Your Irish Times did give the Israeli version, albeit very briefly and curtly, but you chose not to include any of it in your post.
Dishonest really."

Failure to respond to your post doesn't equate to "dishonesty", it means (from what I gathered on another thread) that Jim has for his own reasons, decided not to engage with further debate with YOU. Jim briefly mentioned a piece of current news. That's all. Nothing dishonest in doing that.