"
If you exclude thought itself as a phenomenon, of course, ..."

...but I do NOT do that. We merely differ on how many assumptions we make about the nature of thought. I, obviously, make fewer.

...and I thought I was clear that I DID agree that LH aided the woman in focusing whateveritwas in promoting healing. Biofeedback is documented and on the way to being understood...

Am I once again being chastised/teased/shamed...whatever... for NOT buying into some notion that some ineffable 'thought process' leapt from his 'mind' into her ankle? It is never quite clear what you think I am refusing to consider. Perhaps there IS no 'clear' description of it...and perhaps I just hate to consider it until one is found... ;>))

(I'd love a dollar for every time you have, in various interesting prosody, suggested that I am incapable of recognizing perfectly good 'babies' as I drain the bath. Them little changing swirls of suds that look vaguely like the Pillsbury Doughboy are kinda hard to identify as babies that need saving....and I have no idea how I'd store them....)


"....oh, never mind..."

Oh, I never do...