Wolfgang, please stay with the context. My point wasn't that no one had left. My point was that when someone starts a thread with a gratuitous assertion, that assertion can be gratuitously denied and have as much validity as the original. I find a thread started by someone who acts anonymously, making a gratuitous assertion to be suspect. Fortunately, in grand Mudcat fashion, we have taken it and made it into a valuable thread.

And I still haven't heard what it was that I said in my previous post that was mean. None of it was intended to be such. You will note, please, that the same person who started this thread made the assertion that my post was mean. Just as there was no basis to start the original, there was no response to my request that they explain what was mean. That speaks to me of this person's motive in starting the whole discussion. This is more of the same crap that we have seen before. These people want it to be what they want instead of what it is. That's OK, but not realistic.

Mick