john had asked what evidences there are for God and the reply i offered was ignored by him and rubbished by others

Pete, I didn't answer because so many other already had. They weren't rubbishing you -- they were responding to what you said. They were disagreeing with you, a very different thing than rubbishing. I'm afraid the truth is that your arguments can't hold any water. They are self-referential, circular, and depend on faulty data. Rather than moan about being ignored or trashed, perhaps you could reply to the rebuttals with more convincing facts and logic.