well,has,nt this thread taken off.i wonder if it,s just because someone,s posted who happens to believe the bible..where do i start?
not that i can answer every question and challenge but i can recommend a site that probably covers most-but the hallowed "scientific community"would not entertain answers that threaten their own position!

first to don,whom i very much like despite rubbishing my beliefs.you know very well i dont believe in evolutionism and millenia of uniformitarian change-but at least you have,nt objected to me singing"too much monkey business"-as far as i know!

bill-i am sure there were no suicide bombers on the ark!
"making the evidence fit"can be laid at evolutionists doors also and is assertion proving nothing-except you know how to play to the crowd.
not sure why you are sure there were higher mountains previously but i think that is not entirely relevant.genesis does say every mountain was covered but the waters were in recession when the ark rested in the ararat region.
all that water?the text does mention the "fountains of the great deep"breaking forth.the topology of the earth was likely changed after such earth breaking catastrophe.

little hawk-i am aware of other flood stories.as you concede;they tend to confirm the event,though not the details.

mousethief-i cant be technical myself but i understand the creationist position is that most of the fossils come from the flood,formed by rapid burial,which is also an explanation of why all the intermediate fossils that darwin expected to be unearthed are still scarce.

well,ithink thats enough to get blasted for!.