You mean, I take it then, Greg & Richard, like The Guardian also; or does the fact that that journal's sensationalism happen to reflect what I take to be your own take on political matters somehow exempt it from being deposited into your particular roadside drainage channel?

It has, after all, belatedly got around to this story as its lead in today's online edition. Here is its opening:

···White girls seen as 'easy meat' by Pakistani rapists, says Jack Straw
Row erupts after former home secretary says grooming for sexual abuse is a problem among some Pakistani men···

Doesn't look all that different in its headlining from all the other coverage to me.

All newspapers sensationalise to some extent, for crying out loud. It's how they sell. Show me one which doesn't {except perhaps the FT?} and I will give you a nice red apple.

❦~Michael~❦